<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
<title>If it has an 11.6&quot; screen, is it still a netbook?</title>
<link>http://www.mdj.us/</link>
<description>Are 11.6&quot; screens really netbooks, ultra-lights, notebooks? Comparing the AOA-150 8.9&quot; netbook size against the Acer AS1410 netbook.</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Matt</title>
<description></description>
<link>http://www.mdj.us/netbooks/if-it-has-an-116-screen-is-it-still-a-netbook/#comment-679</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, I'm with you. It's all personal choice really, I've seen a couple of the 11.6&quot; units up close and they're very nice and I surely wouldn't leave one at the right price but they're the same size, and most are slightly heavier than my old Dell 300M.<br />
<br />
At what point does the growth stop adding to the form factor and start taking away? 80% of what I do daily can be accomplished on a netbook, the smaller the better, as long as it has a good keyboard and screen.<br />
<br />
I don't mind 10.1&quot;, I hope the manufacturers stick with that format for some time, and keep adding on to them. I'd love to see souped up 8.9&quot;s (Nvidia ION, dual core Atom, etc), but I'm not holding my breath.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>cappydawg</title>
<description></description>
<link>http://www.mdj.us/netbooks/if-it-has-an-116-screen-is-it-still-a-netbook/#comment-678</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well I think 10.1 is the limit for me on a netbook. I think some of these makers of netbook are getting carried away with all of the screen sizes. A netbook to me is for getting on the net and doing things from there. Isn't that what cloud computing is all about. I think 10.1 is just fine for your general cloud computing. But that is just my opinion.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

